[ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: (Javier Muniz)
Date: 03 Feb 1999
Time: 17:54:46
Remote Name: 209.240.197.21
Group: alt.discuss.webtv.hacking Date: Mon, Jan 11, 1999, 10:15am (EST-3) From: jmuniz@corp.webtv.net (Javier Muniz) Re: Question for our <corp> members Don't worry about real-act, I'm sure he'll be fine. If anyone can contact him tell him not to buy a new box just yet. Our goal is to secure the service, not obliterate those who prove it's insecurities... note that this doesn't mean "hack us, we love it" we will be forceful, and there will be punishment if you do anything that could cause harm to the service or the company. -Javier The views expressed above are mine, not those of my employer. El Cid Campeador «†» wrote in message <11286-3699A29C-4@newsd-102.iap.bryant.webtv.net>... Does the scripting engine in the WebTV® Plus™ reciever have proprietary objects, methods and properties (like the proprietary html tags, ie display, etc)? Do they resemble some of JScript objects which require ActiveX™ (not supported by WebTV®)? The reason for my question, is because of the detailed information contained about the scripting engine at developer.webtv.net, which is about as specific as stating that the grand canyon is a geological formation in a planet in the solar system. By the way, although within WNI's rights, the termination of Real-Act's service was despicable. Perhaps next time Saddam violates UNSCOM inpection team requirements, the US should bomb Iraq with thermonuclear weapons with no less that 500 megaton yield (whitin US rights). I bet the Global community would be real happy!! Plenty of glass parking lot space. P.S. We (myself and I) don't need no stinkin' kerberos.